on the edge
computers & technology, books & writing, civilisation & society, cars & stuff
Greg Blackgjb at gbch dot net If you’re not living life on the edge, you’re taking up too much space.
SyndicationWorthy organisationsAmnesty International Australia — global defenders of human rights Médecins Sans Frontières — help us save lives around the world Electronic Frontiers Australia — protecting and promoting on-line civil liberties in Australia Blogs(Coming soon ) Categories(Coming soon ) Archives(Coming soon ) Software resources |
Thu, 17 Jun 2004Patents suck, patent profiteers suck doubleI’ve come to believe that all software patents should be disallowed retrospectively and that no new ones should be granted to anybody, ever. All the justifications for patents—and there are some, although most seem flimsy to me—are only valid when it comes to protections for material goods that take capital resources to create. Software, apart from the minor cost of programmer time, costs nothing to create in the first place and absolutely nothing to replicate. Patents on software stifle innovation, while giving nothing back to the wider community. And, given the laughable inability of patent examiners to detect prior art, there’s no hope that patents would ever be limited to innovative discoveries, even assuming that they deserved patent protection. This is a long-standing irritation for me and it was brought back to my attention by an IEEE Spectrum feature article that was published today. Here are some snippets:
As far as I’m concerned, companies that innovate, patent and go out looking for infringers to persecute are evil. Companies like Acacia, which create nothing but simply acquire patents in order to get rich by chasing licensing deals and seeking punishment in the courts, should be stamped out of existence.
|